You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Correlation between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in eastern China

Abstract

Background

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is characterized by the presence of at least one cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, underscoring its potential to elevate CVD risk in affected individuals. However, evidence linking MASLD to subclinical coronary atherosclerosis remains scarce, and further investigations are necessary to elucidate the independent role of varying MASLD severities as a CVD risk factor.

Methods

This study analyzed 7,507 participants aged ≥ 40 who underwent comprehensive health evaluations at the Shanghai Health and Medical Center. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to explore the relationship between MASLD severity and the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Correlation analysis was performed to assess the association between MASLD severity and CAC staging.

Results

After adjusting for established CVD risk factors, MASLD showed a significant association with CAC, which intensified with increasing MASLD severity. Among individuals with hypertension, MASLD was markedly correlated with CAC. In contrast, in non-hypertensive participants, only moderate and severe MASLD were significantly associated with CAC, while mild MASLD demonstrated no notable link, even after adjustment for CVD risk factors. Moreover, correlation analysis revealed a positive association between MASLD severity and CAC staging, indicating that higher MASLD severity aligned with more advanced CAC stages.

Conclusion

This study highlighted that MASLD severity was independently associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, irrespective of traditional CVD risk factors, in an urban eastern Chinese population without a prior history of coronary atherosclerosis. The strongest associations were observed in individuals with severe MASLD, emphasizing the importance of assessing MASLD severity in CVD risk stratification.

Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is defined as steatotic liver disease occurring in conjunction with one or more cardiometabolic risk factors, excluding the influence of harmful alcohol consumption. Previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1], MASLD is primarily characterized by the abnormal accumulation of lipids within hepatocytes, detectable via imaging techniques. Globally, MASLD has emerged as the leading cause of chronic liver disease, affecting approximately 30% of adults [2, 3]. This prevalence continues to rise and exhibits notable regional differences. Recent meta-analyses have identified MASLD as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [4]. This recognition highlights the significant interplay between metabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular health, warranting heightened clinical attention to MASLD as a contributor to CVD risk. CVD represents the leading cause of mortality among patients with MASLD, accounting for approximately one-third of deaths, predominantly due to coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcification (CAC), a non-invasive marker of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, serves as a critical independent predictor of CAD. Evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis has highlighted that the coronary artery calcification score (CACS) outperforms other conventional tests in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events, offering substantial prognostic value [5, 6]. Additionally, CACS has proven to be a reliable negative risk indicator for identifying individuals with a low likelihood of coronary atherosclerosis [7, 8]. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended that individuals undergoing annual chest computed tomography (CT) scans for lung cancer screening may also be at moderate risk for coronary heart disease [9]. When employing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening, stratifying patients by CACS can effectively guide the prevention and management of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. The semi-quantitative sequential CACS, derived from routine non-gated chest CT scans, has demonstrated strong concordance with the Agatston score and significant correlation with CAD outcomes [10, 11]. This straightforward and accessible approach enhances the utility of CAC assessment in clinical settings, particularly during lung cancer screening protocols. The simplicity and accessibility of this approach make it an invaluable tool for assessing CAC during lung cancer screenings. With the 2023 introduction of MASLD as the updated terminology for steatohepatitis, the focus has shifted toward the role of metabolic dysfunction. This redefinition highlights an increased CVD risk among MASLD patients [12]. The terminological update underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the interplay between MASLD severity and cardiovascular health. To address this gap, the present study aimed to explore the relationship between MASLD severity and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in an Asian population through a cross-sectional analysis.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Health and Medical Center (Approval No. LLSC2024027). Given the retrospective nature of this analysis, the Ethics Committee waived the requirement for obtaining informed consent from participants. Data were retrospectively collected from comprehensive health examinations conducted at Shanghai Health and Medical Center between January 1 and December 31, 2020. Inclusion criteria encompassed the following: chest LDCT, abdominal ultrasound, and other imaging examinations; complete physical assessments, including measurements of waist circumference, hip circumference, height, weight, and blood pressure; and detailed blood biochemical tests for glucose and lipid profiles. All participants were asymptomatic at the time of evaluation. Exclusion criteria were applied as follows: 2,899 individuals aged under 40 years, 127 participants with a history of CVD, 267 individuals with excessive alcohol consumption, and 48 HBsAg-positive participants. After these exclusions, a total of 7,507 individuals with complete clinical and imaging data were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participant selection flowchart

Clinical history records and laboratory data

Demographic details, cardiovascular risk factors, and anthropometric data were extracted from the database of Shanghai Health and Medical Center. These data included age, gender, hypertension status, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, history of cardiovascular and liver diseases, smoking and alcohol consumption habits, as well as height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and hip circumference. Height and weight were measured using an ultrasonic height and weight device (SK-L06B) to calculate BMI. Blood pressure was recorded using an Omron electronic blood pressure monitor, with particular attention to SBP and DBP. Participants fasted for at least 12 h overnight prior to the collection of venous blood samples for laboratory analysis. The samples were processed using ROCHE C702 automated biochemical analyzers and Roche original reagents to measure fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), uric acid, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Hypertension and diabetes were diagnosed based on medical history, medication use, blood pressure readings, or HbA1c levels. Hyperlipidemia was identified either from a prior diagnosis or by meeting one or more of the following criteria: LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/L, HDL-C < 1.0 mmol/L, TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L, or TC ≥ 5.2 mmol/L. Central obesity was defined as a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) > 0.9 in males and > 0.85 in females. Hyperuricemia was diagnosed when fasting serum uric acid levels exceeded 420 μmol/L in males or 360 μmol/L in females, based on two separate measurements under normal dietary conditions. The Framingham risk score (FRS) was calculated using age, gender, TC, HDL-C, SBP, and smoking status to estimate the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease. Participants were classified as either "low risk" (< 10% 10-year risk) or "intermediate to high risk" (≥ 10% 10-year risk) based on their FRS results.

Measurement of CAC by LDCT

CAC was assessed using a 256-slice CT scanner (GE Healthcare Revolution CT Scanner) following a standardized protocol. The assessment adhered to the guidelines set by the International Cardiovascular CT Association, which categorize the presence of CAC in the left main artery (LM), left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA) as absent, mild, moderate, or severe, corresponding to scores of 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively. Mild CAC was defined as calcification occupying less than one-third of the artery length (CACS = 1), moderate as calcification involving one-third to two-thirds (CACS = 2), and severe as calcification extending over more than two-thirds of the artery length (CACS = 3). The total CAC score was calculated by summing the individual scores of all four arteries, resulting in a range from 0 to 12. Scores were categorized into three severity levels: 0 indicating absence, 1–3 representing mild CAC, and 4–12 corresponding to moderate or severe CAC [10, 13]. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis was defined as a CAC score (CACS) of ≥ 1 in asymptomatic individuals. The evaluation process adhered to a consensus-based approach, requiring agreement between the two attending physicians, who were blinded to clinical data derived from CT images. This rigorous methodology ensured objective and consistent CAC assessment.

MASLD assessment

MASLD was identified in individuals with hepatic steatosis who met at least one of the following cardiometabolic criteria: BMI: ≥ 25 kg/m2 or waist circumference > 94 cm in men and > 80 cm in women; Glucose metabolism: fasting serum glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, postprandial 2-h blood glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 5.7%, or a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) or current treatment for T2D; blood pressure: ≥ 130/85 mmHg or receiving antihypertensive medication; lipid profile: plasma TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L or on lipid-lowering therapy; plasma HDL-C ≤ 1.0 mmol/L for men and ≤ 1.3 mmol/L for women, or receiving lipid-lowering therapy [1]. Hepatic echogenicity, indicative of fatty liver, was evaluated using the Siemens EPIQ 7 real-time color Doppler ultrasound system. This high-resolution device, equipped with a probe frequency range of 1.0–5.0 MHz, was operated by experienced sonographers. Fatty liver disease was diagnosed based on standardized ultrasonic grading criteria: mild fatty liver: liver parenchyma echo slightly stronger than that of the kidney/spleen, with clear visualization of intrahepatic venous structures and the diaphragm; moderate fatty liver: moderately increased liver parenchyma echo compared to the kidney/spleen, with reduced clarity of intrahepatic venous structures and weaker diaphragm echo; severe fatty liver: significantly elevated liver parenchyma echo relative to the kidney/spleen, with blurred or undetectable intrahepatic venous structures and diaphragm echoes [14, 15]. MASLD severity was classified into three categories, mild, moderate, and severe, based on the ultrasonic grading of fatty liver disease. This standardized approach provided a robust framework for evaluating MASLD and its severity.

Statistical analysis

Histograms and QQ plots were employed to evaluate data normality. Continuous variables with a non-normal distribution were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (Q1–Q3), while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons of continuous variables among MASLD severity groups were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post-hoc Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparisons. Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between MASLD severity and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, with adjustments for potential confounding factors. Covariates included in the multivariable model were selected based on clinical relevance, encompassing age, gender, diabetes, BMI, smoking status, hypertension, central obesity, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, and FRS. To further examine the relationship between CAC staging and MASLD severity, the Goodman–Kruskal γ correlation was utilized. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and GraphPad Prism, version 9.5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Baseline features

This study included 7,507 participants with a median age of 52 years and a median BMI of 24.34 kg/m2. The cohort comprised 60.84% males (n = 4,567) and 39.16% females (n = 2,940), with 38.27% (n = 2,873) meeting the diagnostic criteria for MASLD. Based on MASLD severity, participants were categorized into four groups: non-MASLD (n = 4,634), mild MASLD (n = 2,274), moderate MASLD (n = 445), and severe MASLD (n = 154). Across all MASLD groups, the prevalence of MASLD was significantly higher in males compared to females. Participants with MASLD exhibited distinct baseline characteristics compared to those without MASLD. Individuals in the MASLD group were older, had higher BMI values, and displayed a greater prevalence of central obesity, current smoking habits, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, MASLD participants demonstrated significantly elevated levels of SBP and DBP, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, TC, TG, LDL-C, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, and creatinine, while showing lower HDL-C levels. All these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

In the study cohort, 17.26% (n = 1296) of participants had CAC. The prevalence of CAC was 24.63% in the mild MASLD group, 31.69% in the moderate MASLD group, and 39.61% in the severe MASLD group. Mild CAC (CACS 1–3) was observed in 12.20% (n = 916) of participants, while moderate to severe CAC (CACS 4–12) accounted for 5.06% (n = 380). The LAD artery was the most frequently affected among coronary arteries, with calcium proportions in the LM, LAD, RCA, and LCX increasing progressively with MASLD severity (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of participants classified according to MASLD

Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of CAC percentages across varying degrees of MASLD severity. In the non-MASLD group, the proportion of mild CAC cases was 8.33%, whereas in the MASLD group, the percentages increased with severity, reaching 17.06%, 23.15%, and 25.32% for mild CAC. For moderate to severe CAC, the respective percentages were 2.98%, 8.00%, 8.54%, and 25.32%, showing a notable upward trend with MASLD severity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The distribution of CAC percentages across various severity levels of MASLD

The corresponding forest plot highlights the odds ratios (ORs) linking MASLD severity with CAC across all participants. To disentangle the independent associations, we applied multiple adjustment models. Model 2 controlled for age and sex; model 3 included additional adjustments for diabetes, BMI, central obesity, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperuricemia; and model 4 further accounted for the FRS. In the unadjusted model, significant associations were evident between mild, moderate, and severe MASLD and CAC. After adjusting for confounding factors, these associations persisted across models 2, 3, and 4. Further stratification by hypertension status revealed distinctive patterns. Among hypertensive participants, a significant correlation between mild, moderate, and severe MASLD and CAC was consistently observed across all four models. In contrast, for non-hypertensive participants, models 1 and 2 demonstrated significant associations for mild, moderate, and severe MASLD with CAC. However, in models 3 and 4, the association remained significant only for moderate and severe MASLD, while mild MASLD did not exhibit a statistically significant link to CAC (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of risk estimates for MASLD and CAC stratified by fatty liver and hypertension status. Plots illustrate the ORs for identifying the association between CAC and MASLD stratified by fatty liver and hypertension status after adjustment for multiple confounders

A study investigating the relationship between MASLD severity and CAC staging revealed a significant positive correlation (γ = 0.436, P < 0.001). As the severity of MASLD-associated fatty liver degeneration increased, the proportion of individuals with subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis, characterized by a CACS ≥ 4, rose markedly. This finding underscored the progressive cardiovascular risk associated with advancing MASLD severity.

Discussion

This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between the severity of MASLD and subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis in individuals undergoing health screenings with no prior history of CVD. After adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors, a significant association was identified between varying degrees of MASLD and subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis, with the strength of this connection intensifying as MASLD severity increased. The hypertensive subgroup exhibited a particularly strong correlation between MASLD severity and subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis, underscoring the compounding effect of hypertension on this relationship. In contrast, within the non-hypertensive cohort, moderate and severe MASLD showed a clear and significant association with subclinical coronary artery atherosclerosis after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. However, no significant correlation was observed for mild MASLD, highlighting potential differences in cardiovascular risk profiles based on MASLD severity and hypertensive status.

Previous studies have consistently demonstrated a robust association between NAFLD and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, as well as an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events in the global adult population [16,17,18,19]. Recent evidence from a 4.4-year longitudinal cohort study further corroborates this link, reporting a significant relationship between adverse outcomes in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and MASLD (P = 0.007). Moreover, MASLD is strongly associated with adverse cardiac events, with a hazard ratio of 1.82 (95% CI 1.18–2.83, P = 0.007) [20]. In addition, The global prevalence of MASLD has risen dramatically, increasing from 25% in 2016 to over 30% in recent years, with a steadily growing annual incidence rate, underscoring its emergence as a critical public health concern [21, 22]. In our cohort of 7,507 patients, the prevalence of MASLD was approximately 38.27%, slightly lower than the 47.2% reported in a Korean cohort but closely aligning with the findings of a recent meta-analysis that has estimated a prevalence of 38.77% (95% CI, 32.94–44.95%) [23, 24]. These observations highlight the urgent need for large-scale, population-based cohort studies to further explore MASLD, with particular attention to racial and gender differences.

In our study, we accounted for potential confounders, including age, gender, diabetes, BMI, central obesity, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, and the FRS, among participants with CVD. The OR for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis was 1.488 (95% CI, 1.258–1.760; P < 0.001) in patients with mild MASLD, 1.720 (95% CI, 1.317–2.272; P < 0.001) in those with moderate MASLD, and increased significantly to 3.256 (95% CI, 2.182–4.858; P < 0.001) in severe MASLD patients. A correlation analysis further confirmed a positive association between MASLD severity and CAC staging, as evidenced by a direct correlation coefficient (γ = 0.436, P < 0.001). These results highlighted a strong and progressive relationship between MASLD severity and subclinical atherosclerosis.

Notably, a meta-analysis has revealed that approximately 60% of NAFLD patients have hypertension [25], closely aligning with the 52.18% prevalence of hypertension observed in MASLD patients in this study. This finding points to a potential role of hypertension in influencing hepatic lipid deposition. Supporting this, data from the Framingham Heart Study, which has analyzed 1,051 participants, show that individuals with elevated liver fat are at greater risk of developing hypertension (OR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15–1.76; P = 0.001). Additionally, a 6-year follow-up study in middle-aged and elderly participants has underscored a bidirectional relationship between liver fat accumulation and cardiovascular risk factors [26]. Interestingly, a recent cross-sectional study has linked severe NAFLD to a heightened risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, independent of FRS or body fat percentage, whereas mild and moderate NAFLD do not exhibit a significant association with subclinical atherosclerosis [27]. This nuanced distinction emphasizes the importance of stratifying NAFLD and MASLD by severity to better understand their respective impacts on cardiovascular health.

When stratifying participants by hypertension status, our study revealed a significant association between MASLD and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis among hypertensive individuals. In the non-hypertensive subgroup, a notable correlation was observed between moderate and severe MASLD and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. However, this association was not significant for mild MASLD, potentially influenced by differences in study population characteristics. A recent meta-analysis encompassing 19 studies has reported a pooled OR of 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13–1.41; I2 = 76.68%) for subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with mild steatosis, with the risk escalating to 1.68 (95% CI, 1.41–2.00; I2 = 89.02%) in those with moderate to severe steatosis [28]. Furthermore, a prior longitudinal cohort study has demonstrated a dose-dependent relationship between the severity of ultrasound-diagnosed NAFLD steatosis and CAC development in individuals with baseline CACS = 0, independent of traditional risk factors [29]. These findings underscore the potential utility of liver fat quantification in refining cardiovascular risk assessments for MASLD patients.

Although the precise mechanisms linking MASLD to increased cardiovascular risk remain unclear, prevailing theories implicate abnormal insulin resistance, ectopic fat deposition, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction as critical contributors to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. These processes collectively drive systemic inflammation and a prethrombotic state. As MASLD severity progresses, these pathological conditions are likely to intensify and synergize, exacerbating adverse cardiovascular outcomes [30]. Further research is essential to delineate the specific pathways through which MASLD amplifies CVD risk, paving the way for targeted therapeutic interventions. Research demonstrates that dietary and physical activity interventions can significantly improve the histological features of MASLD, particularly by reducing inflammation and fibrosis [31]. One study reported that lifestyle modifications could mitigate steatosis in up to 97% of affected patients [32]. Additionally, passive exercise using whole-body periodic acceleration has been shown to enhance coronary microcirculation and glucose tolerance in patients with T2D, potentially contributing to better prognoses [33].

Current clinical guidelines advise against routine imaging for screening asymptomatic patients [34, 35]. However, CACS is recognized as a reliable and cost-effective method for detecting CAD and serves as a valuable marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. While there is insufficient evidence to warrant specific CAD screening in patients with MASLD, our findings, supported by existing literature, indicated that MASLD could be a risk-enhancing factor for atherosclerotic CVD. In clinical scenarios where CAD is suspected, MASLD may serve as an additional risk-enhancing factor, supporting the decision to perform pre-screening for obstructive CAD [36]. This approach underscores the importance of tailored cardiovascular risk assessments in patients with MASLD to optimize prevention and management strategies.

Strengths and limitations

Our research is distinguished by several strengths, including a substantial sample size and the integration of a broad spectrum of metabolic variables, enabling a comprehensive and contemporary evaluation of the relationship between MASLD and CVD. Nonetheless, certain limitations warrant consideration. First, the study's cross-sectional retrospective design precluded the establishment of causal relationships between subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and MASLD. Furthermore, while accumulating evidence links MASLD to various CVD manifestations, such as cardiac arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and heart failure with or without preserved ejection fraction [37, 38], further longitudinal investigations are essential to delineate these associations. Second, CAC was evaluated using a visual assessment of LDCT images without confirmation via coronary angiography, limiting the ability to comprehensively verify the relationship between MASLD and CAC. Additionally, noncalcified plaques, composed predominantly of lipids, cholesterol, cellular debris, and inflammatory cells, are inherently more unstable than their calcified counterparts [39]. This fragility renders them highly prone to rupture, significantly elevating the risk of severe cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or the necessity for coronary revascularization. Accurate evaluation of noncalcified plaque burden through coronary angiography is critical for outcome prediction, underscoring the need for further research to address this crucial dimension. Third, the degree of fatty liver degeneration was assessed using ultrasound, a diagnostic approach that is inherently subjective and dependent on the expertise and experience of the interpreting clinician. Fourth, the study was confined to a single center, utilized a relatively modest sample size, and lacked comprehensive inclusion of metabolic diseases and cardiovascular risk factors, potentially introducing selection bias. Lastly, the study cohort predominantly consisted of individuals from Shanghai and its surrounding regions, characterized by higher income and educational attainment, which may limit the broader applicability of the findings to more diverse populations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings underscored a strong association between MASLD severity and subclinical atherosclerosis in healthy population screenings, independent of traditional CVD risk factors. This reinforced the connection between MASLD and subclinical atherosclerosis, particularly within Asian populations. Looking ahead, future research will focus on expanding the sample size and longitudinally monitoring the incidence of cardiovascular events to deepen our understanding of the interplay between MASLD and CVD, thereby providing more precise insights into its impact on Asian populations.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data from this research are available by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  1. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). J Hepatol. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031

  2. Loomba R, Wong VW. Implications of the new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024;59:150–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/apt.17846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan WK, Chuah KH, Rajaram RB, Lim LL, Ratnasingam J, Vethakkan SR. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a state-of-the-art review. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2023;32:197–213. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7570/jomes23052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Duell PB, Welty FK, Miller M, Chait A, Hammond G, Ahmad Z, Cohen DE, Horton JD, Pressman GS, Toth PP. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022;42:168–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1161/atv.0000000000000153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blaha MJ, DeFilippis AP. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA): JACC focus seminar 5/8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:3195–216. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeboah J, Young R, McClelland RL, Delaney JC, Polonsky TS, Dawood FZ, Blaha MJ, Miedema MD, Sibley CT, Carr JJ, Burke GL, Goff DC Jr, Psaty BM, Greenland P, Herrington DM. Utility of nontraditional risk markers in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:139–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.058.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Budoff MJ, McClelland RL, Nasir K, Greenland P, Kronmal RA, Kondos GT, Shea S, Lima JA, Blumenthal RS. Cardiovascular events with absent or minimal coronary calcification: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am Heart J. 2009;158:554–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Budoff M, Blaha MJ, Post WS, Kronmal RA, Bild DE, Shea S, Liu K, Watson KE, Folsom AR, Khera A, Ayers C, Mahabadi AA, Lehmann N, Jöckel KH, Moebus S, Carr JJ, Erbel R, Burke GL. 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: derivation in the mesa (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study and the DHS (Dallas heart study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1643–53. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hecht H, Blaha MJ, Berman DS, Nasir K, Budoff M, Leipsic J, Blankstein R, Narula J, Rumberger J, Shaw LJ. Clinical indications for coronary artery calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients: expert consensus statement from the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:157–68. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Narula J, Yankelevitz D, Abbara S. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography and society of thoracic radiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:74–84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Azour L, Kadoch MA, Ward TJ, Eber CD, Jacobi AH. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:8–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mellemkjær A, Kjær MB, Haldrup D, Grønbæk H, Thomsen KL. Management of cardiovascular risk in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Eur J Intern Med. 2024;122:28–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ejim.2023.11.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shemesh J, Henschke CI, Shaham D, Yip R, Farooqi AO, Cham MD, McCauley DI, Chen M, Smith JP, Libby DM, Pasmantier MW, Yankelevitz DF. Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease. Radiology. 2010;257:541–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1148/radiol.10100383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M, Mullen KD, Cooper JN, Sheridan MJ. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:745–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1053/gast.2002.35354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferraioli G, Soares Monteiro LB. Ultrasound-based techniques for the diagnosis of liver steatosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:6053–62. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Targher G, Byrne CD, Lonardo A, Zoppini G, Barbui C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2016;65:589–600. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee HH, Lee HA, Kim EJ, Kim HY, Kim HC, Ahn SH, Lee H, Kim SU. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and risk of cardiovascular disease. Gut. 2024;73:533–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choe HJ, Moon JH, Kim W, Koo BK, Cho NH. Steatotic liver disease predicts cardiovascular disease and advanced liver fibrosis: a community-dwelling cohort study with 20-year follow-up. Metabolism. 2024;153: 155800. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Le MH, Le DM, Baez TC, Dang H, Nguyen VH, Lee K, Stave CD, Ito T, Wu Y, Yeo YH, Ji F, Cheung R, Nguyen MH. Global incidence of adverse clinical events in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024;30:235–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3350/cmh.2023.0485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishihara T, Miyoshi T, Nakashima M, Miki T, Toda H, Yoshida M, Ichikawa K, Osawa K, Yuasa S. Prognostic value of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease over coronary computed tomography angiography findings: comparison with no-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23:167. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12933-024-02268-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/hep.28431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong VW, Ekstedt M, Wong GL, Hagström H. Changing epidemiology, global trends and implications for outcomes of NAFLD. J Hepatol. 2023;79:842–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon JH, Jeong S, Jang H, Koo BK, Kim W. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease increases the risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a nationwide cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;65: 102292. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan KE, Koh TJL, Tang ASP, Quek J, Yong JN, Tay P, Tan DJH, Lim WH, Lin SY, Huang D, Chan M, Khoo CM, Chew NWS, Kaewdech A, Chamroonkul N, Dan YY, Noureddin M, Muthiah M, Eslam M, Ng CH. Global prevalence and clinical characteristics of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review of 10 739 607 individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107:2691–700. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1210/clinem/dgac321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Platek AE, Szymanska A. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease as a cardiovascular risk factor. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023;9:187–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5114/ceh.2023.130744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma J, Hwang SJ, Pedley A, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Chung RT, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Fox CS, Long MT. Bi-directional analysis between fatty liver and cardiovascular disease risk factors. J Hepatol. 2017;66:390–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.09.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsiao CC, Teng PH, Wu YJ, Shen YW, Mar GY, Wu FZ. Severe, but not mild to moderate, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with increased risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21:244. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12872-021-02060-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jamalinia M, Zare F, Noorizadeh K, Bagheri LK. Systematic review with meta-analysis: steatosis severity and subclinical atherosclerosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024;59:445–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/apt.17869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park HE, Kwak MS, Kim D, Kim MK, Cha MJ, Choi SY. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with coronary artery calcification development: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:3134–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1210/jc.2016-1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ismaiel A, DumitraÅŸcu DL. Cardiovascular risk in fatty liver disease: the liver-heart axis-literature review. Front Med. 2019;6:202. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmed.2019.00202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L, Torres-Gonzalez A, Gra-Oramas B, Gonzalez-Fabian L, Friedman SL, Diago M, Romero-Gomez M. Weight loss through lifestyle modification significantly reduces features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(367–378):e365. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong VW, Chan RS, Wong GL, Cheung BH, Chu WC, Yeung DK, Chim AM, Lai JW, Li LS, Sea MM, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Woo J, Chan HL. Community-based lifestyle modification programme for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2013;59:536–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakaguchi M, Fukuda S, Shimada K, Izumi Y, Izumiya Y, Nakamura Y, Nakanishi K, Otsuka K, Ogawa H, Fujita M, Yoshikawa J, Yoshiyama M. Preliminary observations of passive exercise using whole body periodic acceleration on coronary microcirculation and glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Cardiol. 2012;60:283–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC Jr, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e1082–143. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC Jr, Virani SS, Williams KA Sr, Yeboah J, Ziaeian B. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596–646. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Toh JZK, Pan XH, Tay PWL, Ng CH, Yong JN, Xiao J, Koh JH, Tan EY, Tan EXX, Dan YY, Loh PH, Foo R, Chew NWS, Sanyal AJ, Muthiah MD, Siddiqui MS. A meta-analysis on the global prevalence, risk factors and screening of coronary heart disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(2462–2473): e2410. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Li G, Lu Z, Chen Z. Identification of common signature genes and pathways underlying the pathogenesis association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and heart failure. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1424308. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1424308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stahl EP, Dhindsa DS, Lee SK, Sandesara PB, Chalasani NP, Sperling LS. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the heart: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:948–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang MK, Song JE, Loomba R, Park SY, Tak WY, Kweon YO, Lee YR, Park JG. Comparative associations of MASLD and MAFLD with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcification. Sci Rep. 2024;14:22917. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-024-74287-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Shanghai Health and Medical Center Star Talent Program (2023QMX11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design: Guanghui Ma, Guohou Xu, Haixia Huang. Data analysis: Guanghui Ma, Guohou Xu. Data collection: All authors. Drafting of the manuscript: Guanghui Ma. Data interpretation and review and revision of the manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haixia Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Health and Medical Center in Wuxi, China (Approval No. LLSC2024027) and conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983. Given the retrospective nature of this study involving clinical data analysis, the Ethics Committee waived the requirement for obtaining informed consent from participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, G., Xu, G. & Huang, H. Correlation between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in eastern China. Diabetol Metab Syndr 17, 16 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-025-01577-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-025-01577-z

Keywords