You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Correction: Low carbohydrate diets, glycaemic control, enablers, and barriers in the management of type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods systematic review

The Original Article was published on 02 November 2024

Correction: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome (2024) 16:261. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-024-01496-5

In the sentence beginning “Included quantitative studies were published from 1992,…” in this article [1], the text “There were three RCTs, [7, 16, 18], three quasi-experimental [12, 19, 20], three case series (studies that grouped together similar case studies/reports) [14, 17, 22], five case reports (studies that included one participant) [9–11, 13, 15], and one mixed methods study [21]” should have read “There were three RCTs, [7, 16, 18], three quasi-experimental [12, 19, 20], two case series (studies that grouped together similar case studies/reports) [14, 22], six case reports (studies that included one participant) [9–11, 13, 15, 17], and one mixed methods study [21]”.

In the sentence beginning “Examination of the primary outcome ……” in this article, the text “pre- to post-intervention for VLCD and LCD studies that was 2.9% [11–17, 19, 20] and 0.4% [9, 10, 18, 21] respectively” should have read “pre- to post-intervention for VLCD and LCD studies that was 2.9% [9–17] and 0.4% [7, 18–22] respectively”.

In the sentence beginning “Examination of the primary outcome ……” in this article, the text “Hence, a clinically significant impact of VLCDs on HbA1c was evident in eight studies [11–17, 20]” should have read “Hence, a clinically significant impact of VLCDs on HbA1c was evident in eight studies [9–11, 13–17]”.

The Table 3 caption was inadvertently truncated as “Very low carbohydrate diet (≤ 50 g/day or < 10% total energy intake) quantitative” but should read as “Very low carbohydrate diet (≤ 50 g/day or < 10% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes quality of life section the reference for Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany reported as number [20]. Corrected to [11]”.

Incorrect Table 3 caption

Very low carbohydrate diet (≤ 50 g/day or < 10% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes

Author, year, country

Pre intervention

Post intervention

P-value

Primary outcome

HbA1c (%)

   

 Buehler et al. 2021, USA [9]

7.7 ± NR

5.5 ± NR

NR

 Eiswirth, Clark & Diamond, 2018, UK [10]

7.5 ± NR

5.3 ± NR

NR

 Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany [11]

7.2 ± NR

5.1 ± NR

NR

 Kleiner et al. 2022, Italy [12]

8.3 ± 1.7

6.8 ± 0.8

 < 0.001

 Kwiendacz et al. 2019, Poland [13]

6.4 ± NR

5.4 ± NR

NR

 aO’Neill et al. 2003, USA [14]

6.8 ± 1.1

5.5 ± 0.8

NR

 Raab, 2003, Australia [15]

8.4 ± NR

5.6 ± NR

NR

 Ranjan et al. 2017, Denmark [16]

7.0 ± 0.6

6.2 ± 0.4

NR

 aVernon et al. 2003, USA [17]

16.8 ± NR

5.3 ± NR

NR

Secondary outcomes

Bolus insulin (units/day)

   

 Buehler et al. 2021, USA [9]

33 ± NR

1 ± NR

NR

 Eiswirth, Clark & Diamond, 2018, UK [10]

NR

NR

NR

 Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany [11]

20–24 ± NR

12.5 ± NR

NR

 Kleiner et al. 2022, Italy [12]

18.3 ± 9.5

10.3 ± 6.5

 < 0.001

 Kwiendacz et al. 2019, Poland [13]

NR

14.4 ± NR

NR

 aO’Neill et al. 2003, USA [14]

NR

NR

NR

 Raab, 2003, Australia [15]

NR

NR

NR

 Ranjan et al. 2017, Denmark [16]

16.3 ± 7.9

6.6 ± 1.8

0.001

 aVernon et al. 2003, USA [17]

NR

NR

NR

Weight (kg)

   

 Buehler et al. 2021, USA [9]

NR

NR

NR

 Eiswirth, Clark & Diamond, 2018, UK [10]

NR

Decreased by 3

NR

 Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany [11]

61 ± NR

61 ± NR

NR

 Kleiner et al. 2022, Italy [12]

68.9 ± 13.5

66.0 ± 6.8

NS

 Kwiendacz et al. 2019, Poland [13]

NR

62 ± NR

NR

 aO’Neill et al. 2003, USA [14]

NR

NR

NR

 Raab, 2003, Australia [15]

84.0 ± NR

72 ± NR

NR

 Ranjan et al. 2017, Denmark [16]

75.2 ± 11.7

72.9 ± 10.3

NR

 aVernon et al. 2003, USA [17]

61.2 ± NR

69.4 ± NR

NR

Quality of life (participant reported)

   

 Buehler et al. 2021, USA [9]

NR

NR

NR

 Eiswirth, Clark & Diamond, 2018, UK [10]

NR

Improved

NR

 Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany [11]

NR

Improved

NR

 Kleiner et al. 2022, Italy [12]

NR

NR

NR

 Kwiendacz et al. 2019, Poland [13]

NR

NR

NR

 aO’Neill et al. 2003, USA [14]

NR

NR

NR

 Raab, 2003, Australia [15]

NR

Improved

NR

 Ranjan et al. 2017, Denmark [16]

NR

NR

NR

 aVernon et al. 2003, USA [17]

NR

NR

NR

  1. HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, kg kilograms, NR not reported, NS not significant, T1D type 1 diabetes, T2D type 2 diabetes
  2. aParticipants with T1D and T2D in this study – only T1D participant results are reported in this review

Correct Table 3 caption

Table 3 Very low carbohydrate diet (≤ 50 g/day or < 10% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes quality of life section the reference for Gardemann, Knowles & Marquardt, 2023, Germany reported as number [20]. Corrected to [11]

The Table 4 caption was inadvertently truncated as “Low carbohydrate diet (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes” but should read as “Low carbohydrate diet (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes quality of life section the reference for Turton et al. 2023, Australia reported as number [18]. Corrected to [22]”.

Incorrect Table 4 caption

Low carbohydrate diet (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes

Author, year, country

Pre intervention

Post intervention

P-value

Primary outcome

HbA1c (%)

   

 Krebs et al. 2016, New Zealand [18]

7.9 ± 0.9

7.2 ± 0.4

NS

 aIreland, O’Dea & Nankervis, 1992, Australia [19]

11.1 ± 0.6

11.6 ± 0.8

NS

 Nielsen et al. 2012, Sweden [20]

7.6 ± 1.0

6.9 ± 1.0

 < 0.001

 Paul et al. 2022, Australia [21]

8.0 ± 1.7

7.1 ± 1.1

0.003

 Schmidt et al. 2019, Denmark [7]

7.3 ± 0.5

7.4 ± 0.4

NS

 Turton et al. 2023, Australia [22]

7.7 ± 0.5

7.1 ± 0.7

 < 0.01

Secondary outcomes

Bolus insulin (units/day)

   

 Krebs et al. 2016, New Zealand [18]

NR

NR

NR

 aIreland, O’Dea & Nankervis, 1992, Australia [19]

NR

NR

NR

 Nielsen et al. 2012, Sweden [20]

NR

NR

NR

 Paul et al. 2022, Australia [21]

20.3 ± 6.7

13.4 ± 6.5

 < 0.0001

 Schmidt et al. 2019, Denmark [7]

NR

15.1 ± 4.4

NR

 Turton et al. 2023, Australia [22]

NR

NR

NR

Weight (kg)

   

 Krebs et al. 2016, New Zealand [18]

83.2 ± 11.0

78.0 ± 6.4

NS

 aIreland, O’Dea & Nankervis, 1992, Australia [19]

62.1 ± 3.1

61.9 ± 3.1

NS

 Nielsen et al. 2012, Sweden [20]

77.6 ± 15

76.7 ± 14.6

NS

 Paul et al. 2022, Australia [21]

79.3 ± 11.1

77.4 ± 11.3

0.013

 Schmidt et al. 2019, Denmark [7]

77.4 ± 10.6

75.5 ± 10.9

0.012

 Turton et al. 2023, Australia [22]

93.8 ± 18.7

91.4 ± 17.7

 < 0.025

Quality of life (participant reported)

   

 Krebs et al. 2016, New Zealand [18]

NR

NR

NR

 aIreland, O’Dea & Nankervis, 1992, Australia [19]

NR

NR

NR

 Nielsen et al. 2012, Sweden [20]

NR

NR

NR

 Paul et al. 2022, Australia [21]

41.6 ± 11.2

40.5 ± 14.3

NS

 Schmidt et al. 2019, Denmark [7]

30.9 ± 3.8

27.1 ± 6.5

NS

 Turton et al. 2023, Australia [22]

33.8 ± 5.8

30.3 ± 7.4

 < 0.025

  1. HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, kg kilograms, NR not reported, NS not significant
  2. aThis study contained two interventions. One intervention used a low fat, low carbohydrate diet and the other used a high fat, low carbohydrate diet. The high fat, low carbohydrate diet intervention did not meet the definition of a low carbohydrate diet (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) and was excluded from this review. The low fat, low carbohydrate diet intervention did meet the definition of a low carbohydrate diet and was therefore included in this review [19]

Correct Table 4 caption

Table 4 Low carbohydrate diet (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) quantitative studies outcomes quality of life section the reference for Turton et al. 2023, Australia reported as number [18]. Corrected to [22]

Reference

  1. Paul J, Jani R, Thorning S, Obucina M, Davoren P, Knight-Agarwal C. Low carbohydrate diets, glycaemic control, enablers, and barriers in the management of type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods systematic review. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16:261. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-024-01496-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine Paul.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paul, J., Jani, R., Thorning, S. et al. Correction: Low carbohydrate diets, glycaemic control, enablers, and barriers in the management of type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods systematic review. Diabetol Metab Syndr 17, 92 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-025-01654-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13098-025-01654-3